CO129-557-12 Armstrong and Turner v. Estate Duty Commissioner- appeal to Privy Council 18-5-1936 - 2-10-1936 — Page 36

HK

35

Attention is invited to the

last two sub-paragrapho of

para 5 of the covering despatch

regarding the

WK. practice

in the

maller.

In Orudly Gove

would be obliged to bear whether

you will be prepares

lo adrise

this Dept

on the point there

raised

;

and if not, whether

You will uscent win

the practice

from the B.I.R., or if you

would prefer that such an

engining should be made by

this Dept.

butil this point is settled

Ꮧ

appears

undesirable laat lö

under more costs in relation

16 this

appeal

them are

new

ney.

Jam

*.

Vignad H. x. COW.ED